Canadian Legal Innovation β€” Patent Pending 2026

Predict the verdict
before you step into court.

Jury Synthetica runs multi-agent synthetic jury simulations entirely within your own infrastructure β€” zero data transmission, full privilege protection, and dynamic deliberation modelling that captures persuasion, anchoring, and holdout behaviour.

Round 2/3
Deliberation
10 of 12
Plaintiff
J03 Holdout
Risk Juror
$850K
Anchor
100% Local Β· 0 bytes transmitted
78%
Plaintiff Liability
Nguyen v. Pacific Freight
Deliberation Rounds
14
Canadian Jurisdictions
12
Synthetic Jurors
100
Max Deliberation Rounds
100%
On-Premises
1 day
Report Delivery

Five-stage simulation pipeline

Every simulation runs entirely within your infrastructure β€” no cloud, no privilege risk, no third-party data exposure.

1
Document Ingestion
Pleadings, discovery transcripts, expert reports and exhibits are parsed, embedded, and indexed locally using RAG architecture.
2
Venue Calibration
Select your Canadian jurisdiction. Jury Synthetica loads demographic, attitudinal, and historical verdict data calibrated to that specific pool.
3
Juror Synthesis
12 synthetic jurors are generated with full demographic, psychographic, and deliberation-disposition profiles calibrated to the venue.
4
Multi-Agent Deliberation
Three deliberation rounds model persuasion, anchoring, leadership dynamics, and holdout behaviour among the synthetic jurors.
5
Output & Strategy
Verdict probability, damages range, deliberation intelligence, and a risk-adjusted settlement valuation are generated in a structured report.

Watch a simulation run

A motor vehicle accident case β€” Vancouver, BC β€” walk through each stage of the Jury Synthetica pipeline.

1
Fact Pattern
2
Admissibility
3
Venue Selection
4
Jury Synthesis
5
Deliberation
6
Prediction Output

Nguyen v. Pacific Freight Carriers Ltd.

Motor Vehicle Accident Civil β€” BC Supreme Court Trial Ready
File No.
S-245891
Case Summary
On March 14, 2023, the plaintiff, Linh Nguyen (age 38, registered nurse), was stationary at a red light at the intersection of Main Street and Terminal Avenue, Vancouver, when a Kenworth T680 operated by the defendant carrier's employee struck her vehicle from behind at approximately 55 km/h. The driver, employed by Pacific Freight Carriers Ltd., was found to have been operating without adequate rest contrary to the Hours of Service Regulations. The plaintiff sustained a C5–C6 disc herniation requiring surgical intervention, resultant chronic neuropathic pain, and is unable to return to nursing duties.
Plaintiff
Linh Nguyen β€” 38, Registered Nurse, Vancouver BC. Married, two children ages 6 and 9. Annual income: $94,200 CAD. Off work since date of accident.
Defendant
Pacific Freight Carriers Ltd. β€” Major freight operator. Driver: Raymond Cho, 44, CDL holder, 8 years employed. Insurance: $5M commercial policy.
Heads of Damages Claimed
Non-Pecuniary (General)$250,000
Loss of Income (Past)$94,200
Loss of Capacity (Future)$850,000
Cost of Future Care$320,000
In-Trust (Spouse/Children)$45,000
Total Claimed$1,559,200
Key Evidence
βœ“ ECU download β€” 55 km/h at impact confirmed
βœ“ ELD records β€” 14.3 hours on-duty (breach HOS Regs)
βœ“ Surgical report β€” C5/C6 discectomy, Dr. Park, VGH
βœ“ Vocational expert β€” 78% retraining capacity loss
βœ— Pre-existing degenerative disc disease (L3/L4) β€” defence
Defence Position
Contributory negligence alleged (10–15%); dispute over causation of C5/C6 injury given pre-existing L3/L4 findings; challenge to future capacity loss quantum and nursing career prognosis.

Evidence Admissibility

Toggle each piece of evidence as Admitted or Excluded. The simulation recalibrates verdict probability and damages in real time.

πŸ’Ύ
ECU Download β€” Speed at Impact
Engine Control Unit data confirming 55 km/h at moment of impact. Objective, machine-generated record.
High Impact
Admitted
πŸ“‹
ELD Records β€” Hours of Service Breach
14.3 hours on-duty in violation of Hours of Service Regulations. Single most persuasive liability element.
Critical
Admitted
πŸ₯
Surgical Report β€” C5/C6 Discectomy, Dr. Park VGH
Operative and clinical records documenting the disc herniation, surgical intervention, and post-surgical prognosis.
High Impact
Admitted
πŸ“Š
Vocational Expert Report β€” 78% Retraining Capacity Loss
Expert opinion quantifying reduced retraining capacity. Anchors future loss of earning capacity.
Med. Impact
Admitted
🦴
Pre-Existing L3/L4 Degenerative Disc Disease Defence
Defence medical records documenting prior degenerative changes at L3/L4.
Defence Ev.
Admitted
πŸ’Ό
Employment Records & T4 Income Documentation
VGH payroll records, T4 slips, and provincial nursing registration confirming $94,200 annual income.
Med. Impact
Admitted
Live Simulation Preview β€” Admissibility Impact
Liability probability
78%
β€”
Causation probability
82%
β€”
Hung jury risk
6%
β€”
Heads of Damages β€” Calibrated Estimates
Total: $385K β€”
β‘  Non-Pecuniary
Pain, suffering & loss of amenity
$175K
β€”
β‘‘ Past Wage Loss
Income lost from accident to trial
$47K
β€”
β‘’ Future Loss of Capacity
Diminished earning capacity, lifetime
$85K
β€”
β‘£ Medical Specials
Past treatment & surgical costs
$28K
β€”
β‘€ Future Costs of Care
Ongoing treatment & care needs
$50K
β€”
β„Ή Admissibility rulings are applied before jury deliberation. Each head of damages responds independently to the evidentiary record admitted before the trier of fact.

British Columbia Venues β€” Civil Jury Matters

Vancouver
British Columbia
847 verdict records
Victoria
British Columbia
312 verdict records
Surrey
British Columbia
196 verdict records
Kelowna
British Columbia
88 verdict records
Calgary
Alberta
541 verdict records
Toronto
Ontario
1,204 verdict records
Selected Venue Profile
Vancouver, BC β€” Motor Vehicle Accident
MVA Category
$285K
Median Award
Non-Pecuniary
71%
Plaintiff Success
Rate (MVA)
42.6
Median Juror
Age
58%
Post-Secondary
Education

Vancouver Venue β€” 12 Juror Profiles

Ready to generate
Awaiting synthesis command…
Plaintiff-leaningDefence-leaningNeutral

Three-Round Deliberation β€” Nguyen v. Pacific Freight

Round 1 β€” Independent Evaluation
βœ“ Complete

Each juror independently evaluates liability, causation, and damages without exposure to others' positions.

J02
J02 β€” Registered Nurse, 34F, Vancouver
The ELD records are damning. Fourteen hours on duty is a clear regulatory breach. I find liability clear and I'm placing damages at $850,000 to $1.1M given the future care and lost capacity components.
J03
J03 β€” General Contractor, 47M, Burnaby
The pre-existing L3/L4 degeneration is a significant complicating factor. I'd attribute 25–30% contributory negligence to pre-existing vulnerability and I'm skeptical of the $850K loss of capacity figure.
Round 1 Position Summary
Liability β€” Plaintiff
9 of 12
Liability β€” Defence
2 of 12
Undecided
1 of 12
Median Damages
$548K
Round 2 β€” Position Exchange & Anchoring
βœ“ Complete

Anchoring dynamics detected: J02's $850K figure influences susceptible jurors.

J01
J01 β€” Elementary School Teacher, 44F β€” LEADERSHIP
The pre-existing condition is at L3/L4 β€” the injury is at C5/C6. Those are different levels. I'm moving my damages estimate upward to $700,000.
J03
J03 β€” General Contractor, 47M β€” HOLDOUT
I'll concede liability at 80/20 but I'm not moving above $400,000 in total damages. Someone here mentioned $850K β€” that's a plaintiff lawyer number.
Round 2 Position Summary
Liability β€” Plaintiff
10 of 12
Liability β€” Defence
1 of 12
Holdout (J03)
1 of 12
Median Damages
$618K
Round 3 β€” Final Deliberation & Holdout Resolution
βœ“ Verdict Reached
J01
J01 β€” Leadership juror addresses J03 directly
J03, the issue is whether this driver violated HOS regulations on this day. He did. The ELD data is objective. The company is vicariously liable. Let's focus on quantum and agree on a fair number.
J03
J03 β€” General Contractor, 47M β€” RESOLVED
Fine. I'll concede liability. I'll agree to $385,000 β€” that covers the surgical treatment, the legitimate lost income, and reasonable future care. That's my number.
Final Positions β€” All 12 Jurors
Liability β€” Plaintiff
12 of 12
Liability β€” Defence
0 of 12
Hung Jury Risk
6%
Median Damages
$385K

Nguyen v. Pacific Freight Carriers Ltd.

Vancouver, BC Β· Motor Vehicle Accident Β· All processing local
78%
Plaintiff Liability
Probability
Verdict Probability Distribution
Liability
78%
Causation
82%
Punitives
14%
Hung Jury
6%
Juror Verdict Breakdown
J1
J2
J3
J4
J5
J6
J7
J8
J9
J10
J11
J12
Plaintiff (10)Defence (1)Undecided (1)
Calibrated Damages Estimate β€” Vancouver MVA
Low
$310K
Median
$385K
High
$490K
Damages by Component
Non-Pecuniary$175K – $220K
Past Income Loss$80K – $94K
Future Capacity$0 – $125K
Future Care$55K – $85K
Deliberation Dynamics β€” Key Events
βš“
Anchoring detected β€” Round 1. J02's initial $850K figure became the deliberation anchor, pulling the median upward by $68K across rounds.
πŸ“£
Leadership event β€” Round 3. J01 (leadership tendency 0.81) directly distinguished C5/C6 from L3/L4, resolving the J03 deadlock.
πŸ”
Persuasion cascade β€” Round 2. J01's reframing of the HOS breach triggered position shifts in J06 and J10.
Trial Strategy β€” Simulation Intelligence
πŸ“‹
Lead with the ELD data in opening. The 14.3-hour on-duty finding was the single most persuasive liability element across all 12 synthetic jurors.
πŸ”¬
Address L3/L4 directly. Defence's most effective argument. Resolves holdouts when the spinal level distinction is made clearly by a qualified neurosurgeon.
πŸ’¬
Name a high opening number. Anchoring dynamics confirm the $850K figure pulled the final median upward by $68K.
Risk-Adjusted Settlement Recommendation
$290,000 – $360,000 CAD
Recommended Acceptance Range
Probability-weighted expected value at trial: $301K (78% liability Γ— $385K median). Risk-of-trial discount: 18%.
Step 1 of 6 β€” Case Fact Pattern

Secure by design.
Dynamic by architecture.

πŸ”’

Privilege-Preserving Architecture

All inference runs on hardware you control. No API calls to OpenAI, Anthropic, or any external server. Compliant with PIPEDA and provincial privacy legislation.

🍁

Canadian Venue Calibration

The only simulation platform built specifically for Canadian jury pools. Demographics, attitudinal parameters, and historical verdict data indexed by jurisdiction.

βš–οΈ

12-Agent Deliberation Modelling

Multi-agent LLM deliberation replicates persuasion, anchoring, holdout behaviour, and leadership dynamics across three rounds.

πŸ“Š

Calibrated Damages Estimates

Damages outputs calibrated against historical awards in your jurisdiction by case category, injury type, and plaintiff demographics.

🧠

Dynamic Deliberation Engine

Persuasion, anchoring, leadership, and holdout behaviour modelled across three iterative rounds with a full deliberation trajectory.

πŸ’Ό

Settlement Valuation

Risk-adjusted settlement recommendations derived from probability-weighted expected trial value, trial cost factors, and hung jury risk.

Deep psychological modelling.
Up to 100 deliberation rounds.

Jury Synthetica's multi-agent engine maps every juror as an autonomous node β€” running inter-agent influence propagation through a weighted psychological graph.

100
Max Deliberation Rounds
Standard simulations run 3 deliberation rounds. Extended mode runs up to 100 hypothetical rounds, modelling every permutation of persuasion, coalition formation, deadlock, capitulation, and holdout resolution.
12
Autonomous Agent Nodes
Plaintiff-leaning
Defence-leaning
Neutral
Active influence pulse
βš“
Anchoring & Adjustment Bias
The first number spoken in deliberation becomes the cognitive anchor. Jury Synthetica models each juror's anchoring susceptibility coefficient.
πŸŒ€
Group Polarisation & Risky Shift
Deliberating groups systematically shift toward more extreme positions. The engine models risky shift and cautious shift depending on venue demographics and foreperson style.
🧠
Social Proof & Conformity Pressure
As rounds progress, minority-position jurors face escalating social pressure. The model captures Asch conformity dynamics for each holdout.
πŸ”„
Reactance & Persuasion Resistance
High-autonomy jurors exhibit psychological reactance when they perceive persuasion pressure β€” hardening their position when pushed.
πŸ’¬
Emotional Contagion & Narrative Transport
High-empathy jurors transmit emotional states across the jury room, independently updating damages estimates upward.
Live Influence Map β€” Round 2 Snapshot Β· Nguyen v. Pacific Freight
Strongest influence vectors this round
J01
β†’
J03
0.81
J02
β†’
J09
0.74
J02
β†’
J05
0.68
J07
β†’
J12
0.55
J03
β†’
J11
0.48
Psychological mechanisms active this round
Anchoring (J02β†’pool)$850K figure pulling median estimates +$68K
Emotional ContagionJ02 clinical narrative activating J04, J06 empathy
Social Proof9-of-12 coalition applying conformity pressure on J03
Reactance (J03)Autonomy score 0.78 β€” pressure hardening position

Now available for United States
federal and state jurisdictions.

Jury Synthetica extends its simulation engine to all 50 US states and federal district courts β€” calibrated to American jury demographics and state-specific damages frameworks.

Civil Jury Size
🍁 Canada β€” 12 jurors
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US Federal Civil β€” 6–12 jurors
Civil Verdict Rule
🍁 Unanimous or 11/12 (province-dependent)
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Varies by state β€” as low as 5/6
Jury Conduct
🍁 Judge-led, typically 1–4 hours
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Attorney-led, can run days or weeks
Punitive Damages
🍁 Rare, conservative quantum
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Common, multi-million awards frequent

Select Jurisdiction

Civil Matters β€” Jury Eligible
🌴
California
Superior Court β€” Civil Division
9/12 civil verdict rule Β· 12 jurors
πŸ—½
New York
Supreme Court β€” Civil Term
Unanimous civil verdict Β· 6 jurors
⭐
Texas
District Court β€” Civil Division
10/12 civil verdict rule Β· 12 jurors
β˜€οΈ
Florida
Circuit Court β€” Civil Division
Unanimous civil verdict Β· 6 jurors
πŸ™οΈ
Illinois
Circuit Court β€” Cook County
Unanimous civil verdict Β· 12 jurors
🌲
Washington
Superior Court β€” Civil Division
Unanimous civil verdict Β· 12 jurors
🎰
Nevada
District Court β€” Civil Division
Unanimous civil verdict Β· 12 jurors
πŸ¦…
Federal
US District Courts β€” Diversity
Unanimous Β· 6 jurors minimum
Selected Jurisdiction Profile
California Superior Court β€” Personal Injury
PI / Tort Category
$1.2M
Median Award
Personal Injury
67%
Plaintiff Success Rate
9/12
Civil Verdict Threshold
12
Jury Size
38.4
Median Juror Age
High
Punitive Damages Frequency
California operates under CACI jury instructions. Attorney-led deliberation standard. No cap on non-economic damages in most PI matters.

Predict the likelihood of a
unanimous verdict β€” before trial.

Criminal jury simulation operates under a fundamentally different standard. Beyond reasonable doubt. Twelve jurors. All twelve must agree.

Evidentiary Standard
Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Modelled as a 90–95% confidence threshold in synthetic juror reasoning.
Verdict Requirement
Unanimous β€” 12 of 12
One holdout juror produces a hung jury.
Hung Jury Consequence
Mistrial β€” Crown Election
Crown must elect to retry or stay proceedings.
Criminal Simulation β€” Active
R. v. Harrington β€” Fraud Over $5,000 & Breach of Trust
Ontario Superior Court of Justice Β· Toronto Β· Criminal Division
Indictment
CC s. 380(1)(a) Β· s. 336
Case Summary
The accused, a former investment advisor, is alleged to have fraudulently transferred $2.3M from client accounts over 38 months. The Crown has digital records, internal audit trails, and two client witnesses. The defence contests intent, arguing the transfers were authorized under a disputed verbal mandate.
Evidence Strength β€” Crown Case
BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
WeakBalance of ProbabilitiesBRD ThresholdOverwhelming
Unanimity Risk Factors
Digital evidence strength
88%
Defence intent argument
42%
Jury complexity tolerance
61%
Crown witness credibility
74%
Holdout juror probability
18%
Unanimous Verdict Prediction
78%
Unanimous
Guilty
18%
Hung Jury Risk
4%
Unanimous Not Guilty
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
NG
?
βš‘ Holdout Risk Profile β€” J11
J11 β€” Retired civil servant, 61M. Holdout probability 0.72. Recommend peremptory challenge.

Simple, transparent pricing
for litigation teams.

All outputs delivered within 1 business day. All processing fully local.

Full Simulation
$14,500
CAD + tax Β· per matter
Within 1 business day
βœ“Complete 5-stage simulation
βœ“Liability, causation & damages probabilities
βœ“Calibrated damages range
βœ“Risk-adjusted settlement valuation
βœ“Any Canadian jurisdiction
Most Popular
Monthly Unlimited
$9,500
CAD + tax Β· per month
Break-even: ~1.5 simulations/month
βœ“Unlimited full simulations
βœ“Unlimited deliberation reports
βœ“All 14 Canadian jurisdictions
βœ“Priority onboarding & deployment
Save $6,000
Annual Unlimited
$108,000
CAD + tax Β· billed annually
Equiv. $9,000/month β€” 1 month free
βœ“Everything in Monthly Unlimited
βœ“Annual rate locked
βœ“Dedicated implementation support
βœ“Less than one traditional mock trial
πŸ’‘
Consider the alternative. Traditional mock trials cost $40,000–$100,000 CAD per engagement. A single Jury Synthetica annual subscription β€” $108,000 β€” costs less than two traditional mock trials and delivers unlimited simulations for every matter in your practice for a full year.
βš–οΈ

Jury Synthetica is protected by a pending Canadian patent application filed pursuant to the Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4, and a provisional United States patent application filed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Β§ 111(b). The system architecture, synthetic juror generation methodology, Canadian and US venue calibration engines, multi-agent deliberation framework, and privilege-preserving computational architecture described herein are the subject of exclusive intellectual property rights.

Canadian Patent Application Β· Filed April 27, 2026 Β· Vancouver, BC US Provisional Patent Application Β· Patent Pending Β· 35 U.S.C. Β§ 111(b)